BREAKING: Researchers announce possible cure for all cancers in “historic” medical breakthrough
< >
Mostrando 1-15 de 37 comentarios
Acyoax 11 DIC a las 18:04 
Cancer has been effectively reversed ("cured" is a word that can land in prison) multiple times since 1900.
Volvo Fanboi 11 DIC a las 18:08 
This is great news, that they will finally cure Off Topic.
datCookie 11 DIC a las 18:09 
Publicado originalmente por Acyoax:
Cancer has been effectively reversed ("cured" is a word that can land in prison) multiple times since 1900.

Citation required.
󠀡󠀡 11 DIC a las 18:11 
Experimental mRNA novel cancer vaccine, development research at the University of Florida (UF Health).
a loud pop 11 DIC a las 18:13 
I love this extremely working link
miakisfan 11 DIC a las 18:15 
Publicado originalmente por Azza ☠:
Trump actually cancelled funding for a close to finished Cancer cure.

Then again he also added $2.3 Trillion dollars it the US Dept, while doing DOGE Cuts that cost the US Tax Payer $135 billion dollars more than saved. It's like he is trying to bankrupt them on purpose?

https://www.wired.com/story/how-trump-killed-cancer-research/

Trump cut cancer research by 38% and prevented a possible cure from becoming public:
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/IpsdQNooFeM

Trump also cut children's cancer out too, then posed a child with cancer as if Trump was a hero saving it.

Can I get another Liberal lie for 200 Alex?

Sigh ... Anyone else remember Trump talking about curing Cancer in his first term then watching Joe Biden ripping him off during his Presidential term?

Save this TDS crap. You can tell why they can tell lies on the internet. Perfect example.
Acyoax 11 DIC a las 18:16 
Publicado originalmente por datCookie:
Publicado originalmente por Acyoax:
Cancer has been effectively reversed ("cured" is a word that can land in prison) multiple times since 1900.

Citation required.
I don't blame you for wanting to know, but it's also "not my problem" at this point. Sorry.
a loud pop 11 DIC a las 18:16 
Publicado originalmente por Acyoax:
Publicado originalmente por datCookie:

Citation required.
I don't blame you for wanting to know, but it's also "not my problem" at this point. Sorry.
It's okay. I still love you.
datCookie 11 DIC a las 18:18 
Publicado originalmente por Acyoax:
Publicado originalmente por datCookie:

Citation required.
I don't blame you for wanting to know, but it's also "not my problem" at this point. Sorry.

So you don't have a source, good to know. Seems it isn't true, then.
Masque 11 DIC a las 18:23 
Publicado originalmente por Volvo Fanboi:
This is great news, that they will finally cure Off Topic.
Is there a cure for Azza making every single thread into a Trump thread immediately?
Acyoax 11 DIC a las 18:23 
Publicado originalmente por datCookie:
Publicado originalmente por Acyoax:
I don't blame you for wanting to know, but it's also "not my problem" at this point. Sorry.

So you don't have a source, good to know. Seems it isn't true, then.
This is why I didn't reply to you, btw. Waste of energy.
datCookie 11 DIC a las 18:25 
Publicado originalmente por Acyoax:
Publicado originalmente por datCookie:

So you don't have a source, good to know. Seems it isn't true, then.
This is why I didn't reply to you, btw. Waste of energy.

That's not why you didn't reply. I simply and genuinely asked for a source for your claim, you said it wasn't your problem.

Until you can provide a verified source for your claim, your claim will remain untrue.

This is a basic principle of discussion...

The issue here is you.
a loud pop 11 DIC a las 18:25 
Publicado originalmente por Masque:
Publicado originalmente por Volvo Fanboi:
This is great news, that they will finally cure Off Topic.
Is there a cure for Azza making every single thread into a Trump thread immediately?
No.
Acyoax 11 DIC a las 18:26 
Publicado originalmente por datCookie:
Publicado originalmente por Acyoax:
This is why I didn't reply to you, btw. Waste of energy.

That's not why you didn't reply. I simply and genuinely asked for a source for your claim, you said it wasn't your problem.

Until you can provide a verified source for your claim, your claim will remain untrue.

This is a basic principle of discussion...

The issue here is you.
Yes, it is.
datCookie 11 DIC a las 18:26 
Publicado originalmente por Acyoax:
Publicado originalmente por datCookie:

That's not why you didn't reply. I simply and genuinely asked for a source for your claim, you said it wasn't your problem.

Until you can provide a verified source for your claim, your claim will remain untrue.

This is a basic principle of discussion...

The issue here is you.
Yes, it is.

Glad we can agree on you being the problem here.
< >
Mostrando 1-15 de 37 comentarios
Por página: 1530 50