Trump actually cancelled funding for a close to finished Cancer cure.

Then again he also added $2.3 Trillion dollars it the US Dept, while doing DOGE Cuts that cost the US Tax Payer $135 billion dollars more than saved. It's like he is trying to bankrupt them on purpose?

https://www.wired.com/story/how-trump-killed-cancer-research/

Trump cut cancer research by 38% and prevented a possible cure from becoming public:
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/IpsdQNooFeM

Trump also cut children's cancer out too, then posed a child with cancer as if Trump was a hero saving it.

Cancer has been effectively reversed ("cured" is a word that can land in prison) multiple times since 1900.

This is great news, that they will finally cure Off Topic.

Oprindeligt skrevet af Acyoax:

Cancer has been effectively reversed ("cured" is a word that can land in prison) multiple times since 1900.

Citation required.

Experimental mRNA novel cancer vaccine, development research at the University of Florida (UF Health).

I love this extremely working link

Oprindeligt skrevet af Azza ☠:

Trump actually cancelled funding for a close to finished Cancer cure.

Then again he also added $2.3 Trillion dollars it the US Dept, while doing DOGE Cuts that cost the US Tax Payer $135 billion dollars more than saved. It's like he is trying to bankrupt them on purpose?

https://www.wired.com/story/how-trump-killed-cancer-research/

Trump cut cancer research by 38% and prevented a possible cure from becoming public:
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/IpsdQNooFeM

Trump also cut children's cancer out too, then posed a child with cancer as if Trump was a hero saving it.

Can I get another Liberal lie for 200 Alex?

Sigh ... Anyone else remember Trump talking about curing Cancer in his first term then watching Joe Biden ripping him off during his Presidential term?

Save this TDS crap. You can tell why they can tell lies on the internet. Perfect example.

Oprindeligt skrevet af datCookie:

Oprindeligt skrevet af Acyoax:

Cancer has been effectively reversed ("cured" is a word that can land in prison) multiple times since 1900.

Citation required.

I don't blame you for wanting to know, but it's also "not my problem" at this point. Sorry.

Oprindeligt skrevet af Acyoax:

Oprindeligt skrevet af datCookie:

Citation required.

I don't blame you for wanting to know, but it's also "not my problem" at this point. Sorry.

It's okay. I still love you.

Oprindeligt skrevet af Acyoax:

Oprindeligt skrevet af datCookie:

Citation required.

I don't blame you for wanting to know, but it's also "not my problem" at this point. Sorry.

So you don't have a source, good to know. Seems it isn't true, then.

Oprindeligt skrevet af Volvo Fanboi:

This is great news, that they will finally cure Off Topic.

Is there a cure for Azza making every single thread into a Trump thread immediately?

Oprindeligt skrevet af datCookie:

Oprindeligt skrevet af Acyoax:

I don't blame you for wanting to know, but it's also "not my problem" at this point. Sorry.

So you don't have a source, good to know. Seems it isn't true, then.

This is why I didn't reply to you, btw. Waste of energy.

Oprindeligt skrevet af Acyoax:

Oprindeligt skrevet af datCookie:

So you don't have a source, good to know. Seems it isn't true, then.

This is why I didn't reply to you, btw. Waste of energy.

That's not why you didn't reply. I simply and genuinely asked for a source for your claim, you said it wasn't your problem.

Until you can provide a verified source for your claim, your claim will remain untrue.

This is a basic principle of discussion...

The issue here is you.

Oprindeligt skrevet af Masque:

Oprindeligt skrevet af Volvo Fanboi:

This is great news, that they will finally cure Off Topic.

Is there a cure for Azza making every single thread into a Trump thread immediately?

No.

Oprindeligt skrevet af datCookie:

Oprindeligt skrevet af Acyoax:

This is why I didn't reply to you, btw. Waste of energy.

That's not why you didn't reply. I simply and genuinely asked for a source for your claim, you said it wasn't your problem.

Until you can provide a verified source for your claim, your claim will remain untrue.

This is a basic principle of discussion...

The issue here is you.

Yes, it is.