Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem



my idea.
for 16k+ maxed visuals, 5090 is not enough
4060 is close to a 9060xt
could be a little weak for 1440p60 gaming
4070/ti or 5070 would be a better target for higher fps at 1440p 100+hz gaming
https://technical.city/en/video/GeForce-RTX-4070-vs-Radeon-RX-9060-XT
my opinion.
gpu drawing at 4k+ then scaling down is more work than using native 1440p or 1080p res
a 5090 could be pegged at 100% usage doing that even with a single 1080p display and not be cpu bound
Joking, but really any new 50 series will push that CPU, some new games will just push it regardless of GPU, 5060 Ti would be fine but you could go higher and drop a 5800X in if your motherboard allows it, you can find them dirty cheap now.
my zotac 5070 is about 600 USD and was worth every cent even with the bottleneck, running games like arc raiders (yet again, even with the 3600) at 300 fps with framegen all ultra
gddr7 is also extremely worth it